Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having a global score of 88.5 against 74.9. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and realme X50 Pro 5G were released with only 1 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is somewhat thinner and lighter.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit worse display density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a superior memory for applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more powerful processing unit than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM. Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.