Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is much better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 global score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has newer 11 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it gives you a couple additional features. Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is newer, extremely thinner and somewhat lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little lower display pixels density, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit smaller screen. The Galaxy Z Flip 3's storage capacity for applications and games is very similar to realme X50 Pro 5G's one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 and realme X50 Pro 5G count with incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The realme X50 Pro 5G captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a camera with a lot better resolution.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 27 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.