Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, having a score of 92.3 against 74.9. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it counts with some additional features and optimized performance. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G and realme X50 Pro 5G were released with only a few months difference, Galaxy Z Flip 5G is lighter and thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little faster processor than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features much more memory for apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The realme X50 Pro 5G features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 27 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.