Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, having a 94.6 score against 74.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is noticeably heavier but notably thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G, and they were released with only 7 months difference. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels count per inch in the screen.
The realme X50 Pro 5G takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a bigger sensor and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little bit longer battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.