Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | -- |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is much better than realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a global score of 91.1 against 74.9. Both devices we compare here work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a more recent 14 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition construction is extremely thinner but heavier than realme X50 Pro 5G.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has just a bit better looking display than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1968 x 2184 pixels, a lot brighter screen and a larger screen. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a much greater performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution, they both have the same camera aperture.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a bit better battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 4400mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.