Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a general score of 76.1, which is a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's general score of 74.9. The TCL 20 Pro 5G construction is newer and just a little bit lighter, but a little bit thicker than the realme X50 Pro 5G. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but TCL 20 Pro 5G has the newer 11 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides some extra features and performance improvements.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a much better looking display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit superior processing unit than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G features just a bit better camera than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much more MP back-facing camera and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a little better battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.