Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark has a global score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark has newer 9.0 Pie version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, providing the user lots of additional features. The Xiaomi Black Shark body is a little lighter than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but it is just a bit thicker and was released a bit more further than a year before.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a bit more pixels per display inch, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit larger display and much more brightness. Realme X50 Pro 5G and Xiaomi Black Shark feature incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Black Shark has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The realme X50 Pro 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and a lot more MP camera.
Realme X50 Pro 5G and Xiaomi Black Shark have very similar memory capacity to install games and applications, they have equal internal storage. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit superior battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.