Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, with a general score of 82.7 against 74.9. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's design has the same thickness than realme X50 Pro 5G, but it's a bit lighter. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and realme X50 Pro 5G count with incredibly similar processing units, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have a same size display, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much brighter screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit better quantity of pixels per display inch.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as the realme X50 Pro 5G, both of them have the same internal storage. The realme X50 Pro 5G features just a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 5% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.