Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue and Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, having a general score of 83.8 against 74.9. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 construction is a little thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G, although it is just a bit heavier and was released about 16 months before. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have a same size screen, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a lot brighter screen, a little higher screen pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a processor that's just as good as the processor in realme X50 Pro 5G, and although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition and the same aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a much larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Realme X50 Pro 5G has improved battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.