Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has an overall score of 78.2, which is a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 10 OS. Although the Xiaomi Poco M3 and realme X50 Pro 5G were released with only a couple months difference, Xiaomi Poco M3's design is a little lighter but also a little bit thicker.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit higher pixels density. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a greater storage to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has more RAM. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much longer battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Realme X50 Pro 5G captures better videos and photos than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a bigger sensor which offers a better image and video quality, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much better 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.