Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is slightly better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having a overall score of 76.6 against 74.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a a little lighter cellphone than realme X50 Pro 5G, but they are 0.35inches thick. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit greater pixels count per inch in the display. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit more storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has superior battery lifetime than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 20 percent larger battery capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G takes much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.