Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's score of 74.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body has the same thickness than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but it's a little heavier. These phones include the same Android 10 OS, so both should provide identical operating system features.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a little bit better pixel count per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a greater memory to store more apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's camera is just as good as the realme X50 Pro 5G one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a tinier diafragm aperture, they both have the same video frame rates, a same size back-facing camera sensor, a camera with a 64 mega-pixels resolution and the same (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.