Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a general score of 79, which is a little bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's global score of 74.9. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a newer 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides a lot of extra features. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a just a little bit heavier device than realme X50 Pro 5G, but both of them are equally thin.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a little bit higher pixel density. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with superior battery life than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 20% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.