Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is just a bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, with a global score of 78.1 against 74.9. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and just a little bit lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a more recent 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a brighter screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a just a bit better pixels count per inch in the screen. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a processor that's very similar to the realme X50 Pro 5G one, and although the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features just a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same video quality and a camera in the back with a 64 mega-pixels resolution.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's storage to install applications and games is just as good as the realme X50 Pro 5G one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a little better battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.