Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.37 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.28 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1295.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the RED Hydrogen One, getting a 98.9 score against 66.5. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer phone, and it's also lighter and somewhat thinner than the RED Hydrogen One. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better processing power than RED Hydrogen One, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better looking screen than RED Hydrogen One, because although it has a quite worse pixel count per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bigger display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than RED Hydrogen One, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than RED Hydrogen One, because it has a camera in the back with lot more MP and a much better video resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and RED Hydrogen One count with incredibly similar batteries performance.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a bit more money than the RED Hydrogen One, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.