Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.5 | 69.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 |
| 2018-11-02 | 2012-05-03 |
| 6.49 x 3.37 x 0.39 inches | 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.28 ounces | 4.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1295.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| -- | 300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.3 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 830 hours standby time 22.5 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III has a score of 69.7, which is a bit better than the RED Hydrogen One's general score of 66.5. The Samsung Galaxy S III construction is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than RED Hydrogen One, even though it was released many years before. Galaxy S III and RED Hydrogen One have really similar displays, although the Galaxy S III has a little bit smaller screen, a much lower resolution of 1280 x 720 and a much lower pixel amount per inch of screen.
The RED Hydrogen One counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and more cores. The Galaxy S III shoots greater photographs and videos than RED Hydrogen One, although it has a camera with way less mega pixels resolution and a way lower 1920x1080 video quality.
RED Hydrogen One features a very superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that holds up to 128 GB. RED Hydrogen One counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a 114% bigger battery size.
The Galaxy S III is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.