Compare phones
Samsung Ace
SPH-I325| Global Score | |
| 38.1 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Windows Mobile Standard 6.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-14 |
| 4.65 x 2.32 x 0.46 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 3.84 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | White |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 69.00 | $ 70.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 174 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 96 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 C is much better than the Samsung Ace, having a overall score of 64.8 against 38.1. The Nokia 3.1 C works with Android 9.0 Pie operating system, while Samsung Ace counts with Windows Mobile Standard 6.0 operating system. The Nokia 3.1 C construction is much heavier but somewhat thinner than Samsung Ace.
The Nokia 3.1 C counts with a much better screen than Samsung Ace, because it has a much higher number of pixels per screen inch, a way larger screen and a way higher 720 x 1440px resolution. The Nokia 3.1 C has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Ace. The Nokia 3.1 C features a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Ace, because it has 4 more CPU cores and more RAM memory.
The Nokia 3.1 C counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Ace, because it has 2990mAh of battery capacity instead of 1300mAh. Nokia 3.1 C takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Ace, because it has a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Nokia 3.1 C costs a little more money than the Samsung Ace, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.