Search


Compare phones

Global Score
38.341.9
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
--2012-11-29
4.30 x 2.06 x 0.50 inches4.10 x 2.10 x 0.80 inches
3.32 ounces4.70 ounces
$ 145.00$ 105.00
Display / Screen
3 inches2.4 inches
240 x 400 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFT--
155 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
YesNo touch screen
5.76.1
Performance
--STE PNX6809L chipset
processor Single-Core 468 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.57
Storage
73,73 MB internal memory262,14 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
1.52.12
Camera
2.00 MP3.00 MP
4.735.06
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
0.91
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1300mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
350 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
480 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
2.563.04
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPSGPS

Comparison review

Samsung Rugby III has an overall score of 41.9, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Advance's 38.3 general score. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Samsung Rugby III design is noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker than Samsung Advance. Samsung Rugby III counts with a superior CPU than Samsung Advance, because it has a greater number of cores.

The Samsung Rugby III counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Advance, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower 320 x 240 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. The Samsung Rugby III features a little bit better camera than Samsung Advance, because it has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.

Samsung Rugby III has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Advance, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 32 GB and 262,14 MB internal memory. Samsung Rugby III has better battery duration than Samsung Advance, because it has 1300mAh of battery capacity.

The Samsung Rugby III is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.