Compare phones
Samsung ATIV S Neo
AT&Ti187
| Global Score | |
| 66.4 | 72.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-06-26 | 2020-06-12 |
| 5.33 x 2.72 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.68 ounces |
| -- | Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 420 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Fast has an overall score of 72.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung ATIV S Neo's 66.4 score. Moto G Fast's construction has the same thickness than Samsung ATIV S Neo, but it's incredibly heavier. Moto G Fast comes with Android 11 operating system, while Samsung ATIV S Neo comes with Windows Phone 8.1 operating system.
The Samsung ATIV S Neo has a better display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher display pixel density. Motorola Moto G Fast features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
Moto G Fast counts with a much better camera than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because it has a lot higher resolution camera and a lot better (4K) video definition. The Moto G Fast has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G Fast has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because it has a 100 percent larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Moto G Fast is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.