Compare phones
Samsung ATIV S Neo
AT&Ti187
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 66.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2013-06-26 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.33 x 2.72 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Krait 300 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 420 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 80.7, which is much better than Samsung ATIV S Neo's global score of 66.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with Android 5.0 OS, while Samsung ATIV S Neo has Windows Phone 8.1 OS. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 and the Samsung ATIV S Neo were released with only 2 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Note 3's body is a bit thinner but heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little better performance than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because it has more RAM memory, a faster 600 megahertz graphics processor and a higher number of cores. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because it has a bigger screen, a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a lot higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung ATIV S Neo, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 64 GB, the Galaxy Note 3 also has 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Note 3 has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with a lot higher 13 mega-pixels resolution.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper than the Samsung ATIV S Neo.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.