Compare phones
Samsung ATIV S Neo
GT-I8750| Global Score | |
| 66.4 | 72.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2013-06-26 | 2018-06-11 |
| 5.33 x 2.72 x 0.36 inches | 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.94 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone 5Q is a bit better than the Samsung ATIV S Neo, with a 72.6 score against 66.4. The Asus ZenFone 5Q body is much newer and somewhat thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Samsung ATIV S Neo. Samsung ATIV S Neo features a little sharper display than Asus ZenFone 5Q, although it has a way lower 1280 x 720 resolution, a quite worse pixels density and a way smaller display.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q has a bit better processing power than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more processing cores and more RAM. Asus ZenFone 5Q has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 48 GB more internal memory capacity.
Asus ZenFone 5Q has a superior battery life than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because it has a 65% bigger battery capacity. Asus ZenFone 5Q counts with a way better camera than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because it has a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a much better 16 mega pixels resolution.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Asus ZenFone 5Q is also by far the cheapest, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.