Compare phones
Samsung ATIV S Neo
GT-I8750| Global Score | |
| 66.4 | 72.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 10 |
| 2013-06-26 | 2020-06-02 |
| 5.33 x 2.72 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Arctic white and Glacier blue |
| -- | Glass and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Krait 300 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The realme X3 SuperZoom is a little bit better than the Samsung ATIV S Neo, getting a 72.6 score against 66.4. The realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 operating system, and Samsung ATIV S Neo works with Windows Phone 8 operating system. The realme X3 SuperZoom design is way newer and a bit thinner, but also noticeably heavier than Samsung ATIV S Neo.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a better CPU than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and 6 more cpu cores. The realme X3 SuperZoom and Samsung ATIV S Neo both feature similar screens, although the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a lot bigger screen, a better display density and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features much more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a much better battery duration than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the realme X3 SuperZoom is also by far the cheapest, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.