Search


Compare phones

Global Score
66.469.7
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
Windows Phone 8Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4
2013-06-262012-05-03
5.33 x 2.72 x 0.36 inches5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches
5.08 ounces4.69 ounces
--Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White
--Plastic
Scratch-Resistant GlassScratch-Resistant Glass
$ 550.00$ 265.00
Display / Screen
4.8 inches4.8 inches
720 x 1280 pixels (HD)720 x 1280 pixels (HD)
TFTSuper AMOLED
306 pixels per inch306 pixels per inch
--300 cd/m2 brightness
Capacitive, Multi-touchCapacitive, Multi-touch
8.28.6
Performance
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930AA chipsetSamsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset
Krait 300 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processorARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor
1 GB (533 MHz) RAM1 GB RAM
Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPUARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU
8.379
Storage
16 GB internal memory16 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot
6.166.16
Camera
8.00 MP + 1.20 MP8.00 MP + 1.90 MP
--f/2.60 aperture
--0.33 inches (1/3") sensor
1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
7.488.47
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMAHSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMMicro SIM
64.6
Battery Life
2000mAh Li-Ion Battery2100mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--Wireless Charging
15 hours talk time830 hours standby time
22.5 hours talk time
3.924
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 4.0
GPSGPS
NFCNFC
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Samsung Galaxy S III is a little bit better than the Samsung ATIV S Neo, getting a 69.7 score against 66.4. Although Samsung Galaxy S III is older than the Samsung ATIV S Neo, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and a little thinner. Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3 operating system, while Samsung ATIV S Neo works with Windows Phone 8 operating system.

The Galaxy S III has a bit better CPU than Samsung ATIV S Neo, and although they both have 1 GB of RAM, the Galaxy S III also has more 1.4 GHz cpu cores and a better graphics processor running at 1.06 gigahertz. The Galaxy S III has a bit more vivid display than Samsung ATIV S Neo. They have a screen with the same size, a higher count of pixels per inch of display and the same resolution of 1280 x 720px.

Samsung Galaxy S III shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung ATIV S Neo. Both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a 8 MP camera in the back. Galaxy S III counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as Samsung ATIV S Neo, both of them have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 64 GB and exactly the same internal storage.

The Samsung Galaxy S III has just a little better battery life than Samsung ATIV S Neo, because it has a 5 percent more battery capacity.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S III is also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.