| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2014-04-04 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.42 x 2.75 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.79 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Quad-Core 2300 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
HTC U Ultra is a little bit better than Samsung ATIV SE, having a overall score of 77 against 71.9. The HTC U Ultra construction is newer and just a little thinner than the Samsung ATIV SE's, although it's a lot heavier. The Samsung ATIV SE features a slightly better looking display than HTC U Ultra, although it has a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a bit smaller screen.
The HTC U Ultra has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has 48 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung ATIV SE features just a little better performance than HTC U Ultra, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, and they both have 4 cpu cores, the Samsung ATIV SE also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has a 15 percent larger battery size. HTC U Ultra has a way better camera than Samsung ATIV SE, because although it has a camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung ATIV SE, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung ATIV SE. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Samsung ATIV SE, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.