Compare phones
Samsung ATIV SE
SM-W750V| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-04-04 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.42 x 2.75 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.79 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2300 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force has a general score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung ATIV SE's overall score of 71.9. Moto Z Force's construction is noticeably newer and thinner than the Samsung ATIV SE's, but it's also heavier. The Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat OS, while Samsung ATIV SE counts with Windows Phone 8 OS.
The Samsung ATIV SE has a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have 4 cores, the Samsung ATIV SE also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Samsung ATIV SE features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a bit worse screen pixels density, a way lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a bit smaller screen.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. The Moto Z Force counts with a very superior camera than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Motorola Moto Z Force has greater battery lifetime than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto Z Force costs a little more than the Samsung ATIV SE, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.