Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 15 |
| 2014-04-04 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.42 x 2.75 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 4.79 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gray | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 441 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2300 MHz processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a general score of 79.2, which is much better than the Samsung ATIV SE's general score of 71.9. Although the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is notably heavier than the Samsung ATIV SE, it's thinner and also much newer. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with Android 15 operating system, while Samsung ATIV SE comes with Windows Phone 8 operating system.
Samsung ATIV SE counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU. Samsung ATIV SE features a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a much smaller screen.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung ATIV SE, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 496 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures way better videos and photos than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has a back camera with way more megapixels and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has an 81% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.