Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-04-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.42 x 2.75 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.79 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2300 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Samsung ATIV SE's overall score of 71.9. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has Android 13 OS, while Samsung ATIV SE comes with Windows Phone 8 OS. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a noticeably newer and a bit thinner device than Samsung ATIV SE, although it's also noticeably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little better hardware performance than Samsung ATIV SE, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and 10 GB more RAM memory. Samsung ATIV SE counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, a really smaller screen and a just a bit inferior pixels quantity in each screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better photos and videos than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has a lot higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has a 73% bigger battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than Samsung ATIV SE, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.