Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-04-04 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.42 x 2.75 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.79 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2300 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Samsung ATIV SE, having a general score of 98 against 71.9. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a extremely newer cellphone than the Samsung ATIV SE, although it's just a little thicker and incredibly heavier. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G comes with Android 13 OS, while Samsung ATIV SE works with Windows Phone 8 OS.
Samsung ATIV SE counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a lot smaller screen, a just a little worse pixel density and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better performance than Samsung ATIV SE, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and 4 more cores.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater camera than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has a lot higher 108 mega-pixels resolution camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better battery life than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than the Samsung ATIV SE, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.