Compare phones
Samsung ATIV SE
SM-W750V| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 13 |
| 2014-04-04 | 2023-05-09 |
| 5.42 x 2.75 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.79 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 SM7475-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2300 MHz processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 725 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.93 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F5 has a global score of 78.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung ATIV SE's score of 71.9. The Xiaomi Poco F5 counts with Android 13 OS, while Samsung ATIV SE comes with Windows Phone 8 OS. The Xiaomi Poco F5 construction is extremely newer and a little bit thinner than Samsung ATIV SE's, but it's also much heavier.
The Samsung ATIV SE has a much powerful processor than Xiaomi Poco F5, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Samsung ATIV SE counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco F5, because although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater count of pixels in each inch in the display.
Xiaomi Poco F5 captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has a camera with way more mega-pixels. Xiaomi Poco F5 has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung ATIV SE, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Poco F5 counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung ATIV SE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.