Compare phones
Samsung B3310
GT-B3310| Global Score | |
| 36.9 | 35.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2009-08-24 | 2008-02-11 |
| 3.58 x 2.13 x 0.67 inches | 3.91 x 1.88 x 0.58 inches |
| 3.56 ounces | 3.24 ounces |
| $ 49.00 | $ 50.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | 2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 200 pixels per inch | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 10,24 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 1.30 MP |
| 4.73 | 4.51 |
| EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 380 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung B3310 is just a bit better than the Samsung SGH-J700, with a 36.9 score against 35.7. The Samsung B3310 construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Samsung SGH-J700. Samsung B3310 features a lot better looking display than Samsung SGH-J700, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung B3310 also has a much higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher 320 x 240px resolution.
The Samsung SGH-J700 features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung B3310, although it has no SD memory card expansion slot. Samsung SGH-J700's processor is very similar to Samsung B3310's CPU, they have 0 cores. The Samsung SGH-J700 counts with a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Samsung B3310 one.
The Samsung B3310 has a little bit better camera than Samsung SGH-J700, because it has a much better resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung B3310 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.