Search


Compare phones

Samsung Access

SGH-A827
Global Score
37.438.4
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
2008-09-182008-03-27
3.80 x 1.85 x 0.67 inches4.49 x 2.28 x 0.47 inches
3.56 ounces3.46 ounces
$ 1599.00$ 1590.00
Display / Screen
2 inches2.3 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
200 pixels per inch174 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.36.1
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
71,68 MB internal memory102,4 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.50.6
Camera
2.00 MP1.30 MP
4.734.51
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.9
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1300mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
400 hours standby time
7 hours talk time
400 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.243.04
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0
Accelerometer--
--Digital TV Broadcast

Comparison review

Samsung Access has a general score of 38.4, which is a little bit better than Samsung BEATs's overall score of 37.4. Even when the Samsung Access and the Samsung BEATs were released with only 6 months difference, the Samsung Access is much thinner and a bit lighter. Samsung BEATs and Samsung Access both count with similar processing units, both have a 0-Core CPU.

Samsung BEATs features a bit sharper display than Samsung Access, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 320 x 240px, the Samsung BEATs also counts with a quite higher screen density. Samsung Access features a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung BEATs, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 102,4 MB internal storage.

The Samsung BEATs counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Access, because it has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera. Samsung Access has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung BEATs, because it has 1300mAh of battery capacity.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Access is also cheaper than the Samsung BEATs.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.