Search


Compare phones

Global Score
37.140.4
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
--2011-01-18
4.53 x 1.81 x 0.50 inches4.23 x 2.13 x 0.49 inches
2.87 ounces3.32 ounces
$ 155.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
2 inches3 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
102 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive
5.25.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
43,01 MB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
1.161
Camera
1.30 MP + 0.10 MP3.20 MP
320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
5.065.39
Networks
--Wi-Fi
UMTS, EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.42.7
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
530 hours standby time
8.8 hours talk time
900 hours standby time
8.3 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1Bluetooth 3.0
--Accelerometer

Comparison review

Samsung Star II is a bit better than the Samsung C5010, getting a 40.4 score against 37.1. Samsung Star II's design is just a little bit thinner but somewhat heavier than the Samsung C5010. The Samsung Star II counts with a sharper screen than Samsung C5010, because it has a way larger screen, a lot better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a much better 400 x 240 resolution.

The Samsung Star II has a processor that's very similar to Samsung C5010's processor, both of them have the same number of cores. Samsung Star II has a little bit better camera than Samsung C5010, and although they both have the same 320x240 video resolution and the same 15 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Star II also has a much more megapixels back facing camera.

The Samsung C5010 features a better storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Star II, although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 8 GB smaller. The Samsung Star II features greater battery life than Samsung C5010, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.

The Samsung Star II not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it a no doubt choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.