Compare phones
Samsung Champ
GT-C3300K, GT-C3300Samsung Star II
S5260| Global Score | |
| 37.4 | 40.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2010-05-19 | 2011-01-18 |
| 3.79 x 2.12 x 0.51 inches | 4.23 x 2.13 x 0.49 inches |
| 2.82 ounces | 3.32 ounces |
| $ 90.00 | $ 79.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 400 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | Capacitive |
| 6 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 30,72 MB internal memory | -- |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.16 | 1 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 3.20 MP |
| -- | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 5.39 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 2.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 666 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | 900 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| -- | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
The Samsung Star II is slightly better than Samsung Champ, having a score of 40.4 against 37.4. The Samsung Star II design is somewhat heavier but just a little bit thinner than Samsung Champ, and both of them were only released with a couple months difference. The Samsung Champ has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Star II, because although it has a quite lower 320 x 240px resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Champ has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Star II, although it has a SD memory slot that admits 8 GB smaller. The Samsung Star II's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Samsung Champ, both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Star II shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Champ, because it has a lot better 3.2 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Star II's battery life is just as good as the Samsung Champ one.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Star II is also the cheapest one, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.