Compare phones
Samsung Corby S3650
GT-S3650| Global Score | |
| 37.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2009-09-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.06 x 2.22 x 0.47 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.28 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 51,2 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.4 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 960mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 730 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.48 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is much better than the Samsung Corby S3650, getting an 80 score against 37.3. The Google Pixel 3 design is way newer and incredibly thinner, but notably heavier than the Samsung Corby S3650. The Google Pixel 3 features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Corby S3650, because it has a higher number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Corby S3650, because it has a much larger display, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a lot higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Corby S3650, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
Google Pixel 3 captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Corby S3650, because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels. Google Pixel 3 has a way better battery life than Samsung Corby S3650, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity against 960mAh.
Google Pixel 3 costs a bit more than Samsung Corby S3650, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.