Compare phones
Samsung Corby S3650
GT-S3650| Global Score | |
| 37.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2009-09-01 | 2020-11-27 |
| 4.06 x 2.22 x 0.47 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 3.28 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 143 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 51,2 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.73 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 960mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 730 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.48 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 is much better than the Samsung Corby S3650, having a score of 78.2 against 37.3. Although Xiaomi Poco M3 is much heavier than the Samsung Corby S3650, it's somewhat thinner and also incredibly newer. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a lot better screen than Samsung Corby S3650, because it has a really bigger screen, a much higher amount of pixels per display inch and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Corby S3650, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much powerful CPU than Samsung Corby S3650, because it has more cpu cores. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Corby S3650, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a lot better camera than Samsung Corby S3650, because it has a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Poco M3 is also cheaper, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.