Search


Compare phones

Global Score
30.436.7
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--2008-08-19
4.21 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches
2.29 ounces5.29 ounces
$ 2160.00$ 2100.00
Display / Screen
1.4 inches2 inches
128 x 128 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
CSTNOLED
129 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.56.6
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--4 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
02.5
Camera
--3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
05.61
GSMUMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.10.4
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
120 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
300 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--Accelerometer

Comparison review

The Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte has a global score of 36.7, which is way better than Samsung E1080's 30.4 score. Despite being the best we are comparing, the Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte is a much heavier and a little thicker phone than the Samsung E1080. Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte features a way better looking screen than Samsung E1080, because it has a much better resolution of 320 x 240, a way bigger display and a much greater pixels density.

Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung E1080. Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte features a processing unit that is just as good as the Samsung E1080 one, both have the same number of cores. Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung E1080.

Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte counts with improved battery duration than Samsung E1080, because it has a 1000mAh battery size instead of 800mAh.

Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.