Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3032.6
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--2012-05-15
3.81 x 1.78 x 0.71 inches4.35 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches
2.38 ounces3.02 ounces
$ 125.00$ 99.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches1.8 inches
128 x 160 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
CSTNLCD
114 pixels per inch114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.35.3
processor processor
--16 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.67
Storage
1,54 MB internal memory10,24 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.11.52
Camera
--0.30 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
04.4
GPRS and GSMEDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM, Dual SIM
0.20.4
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1400mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
839 hours standby time
14 hours talk time
2.243.12
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Nokia 112 is a little bit better than Samsung E1360, with a 32.6 score against 30. Nokia 112 is a thinner but much heavier device than Samsung E1360. Samsung E1360 counts with a little faster CPU than Nokia 112. Both have 0 CPU cores. Nokia 112 counts with a display that is just as good as the display in Samsung E1360, they have a same size screen, exactly the same resolution of 160 x 128px and the same display pixel density.

The Nokia 112 features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung E1360, because it has 10,24 MB internal memory and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 32 GB. Nokia 112 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung E1360. Nokia 112 has a much longer battery performance than Samsung E1360, because it has 1400mAh of battery capacity instead of 800mAh.

In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Nokia 112 is also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.