Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 2.1 | -- |
| 2010-06-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.47 x 2.17 x 0.50 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.84 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 240 x 400 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 146 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Single-Core 667 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.84 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 174,08 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.39 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 625 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy 3's 46.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy A50's design is noticeably newer and a lot thinner than Samsung Galaxy 3's, but it is way heavier. The Galaxy A50 has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy 3, because it has a way bigger display, a lot greater pixel count per inch of display and a lot better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a lot better performance than Galaxy 3, because it has more cpu cores. Galaxy A50 features a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy 3, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A50 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 1500mAh.
Galaxy A50 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy 3, because it has a way higher 1920x1080 video definition and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also cheaper than the Galaxy 3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.