Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-11-13 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a global score of 93.2, which is much better than the Galaxy A01's overall score of 71.6. IPhone 12 Pro Max's construction is newer and thinner than Galaxy A01's, although it is also notably heavier. IPhone 12 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy A01 works with Android 11 operating system.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a way better resolution of 1284 x 2778px, a larger screen and a lot better display density. IPhone 12 Pro Max has more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A01, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a quite superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has 2 lesser cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and more RAM. IPhone 12 Pro Max has a much better camera than Galaxy A01, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
IPhone 12 Pro Max has better battery lifetime than Galaxy A01, because it has a 3687mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A01. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A01, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.