Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-01-20 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a lot better than the Galaxy A01, getting a 93.2 score against 71.6. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max design is newer and a little thinner than the Galaxy A01's, but it is also much heavier. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A01 works with Android 11 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A01, because it has a bigger screen, a way better screen pixel density and a way higher 1284 x 2778 resolution. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A01, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 4 GB more RAM and a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. IPhone 13 Pro Max shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a camera with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better video definition and a lot larger aperture.
IPhone 13 Pro Max features a way better battery duration than Galaxy A01, because it has a 45 percent more battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A01. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A01, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.