Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A01's score of 71.6. Apple iPhone X's body is a little bit thinner than Galaxy A01, but it is heavier and was released 2 years before. IPhone X features a superior processing unit than Galaxy A01, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The iPhone X has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A01, because it has a way greater pixel density, a way better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen. The iPhone X shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments, a much higher (4K) video quality and a larger camera sensor.
IPhone X counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A01, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A01 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A01. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A01, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.