Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is much better than the Galaxy A01, getting a score of 82 against 71.6. Apple iPhone XR is a heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A01, but they are equally thin. The Apple iPhone XR features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a quite better pixel density, a quite better 828 x 1792 resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The Apple iPhone XR has a better processor than Galaxy A01, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor and more RAM. The Apple iPhone XR captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A01, because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos.
Galaxy A01 counts with a little bit better storage to install applications and games than iPhone XR, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Apple iPhone XR's battery lifetime is just as good as the Galaxy A01 one, although the Apple iPhone XR has just 2942mAh of battery size.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A01. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A01, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.