Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A01, with a global score of 84.2 against 71.6. Despite of the fact iPhone XS is older and heavier than Samsung Galaxy A01, it's body is still a little bit thinner. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a faster processor than Galaxy A01, because although it has 2 less cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a 64-bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A01, because it has a little larger display, a much higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a much higher screen pixels density. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A01, because although it has a back camera with less megapixels, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition, a larger sensor and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and video.
The Samsung Galaxy A01 counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy A01 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A01. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A01, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.