Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is much better than the Galaxy A01's general score of 71.6. Even though Google Pixel 3 is older than Galaxy A01, it's construction is a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner. The Google Pixel 3 features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a higher pixels count in each inch in the display.
The Galaxy A01 features a slightly bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a back camera with lesser MP resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A01 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3 percent greater battery size.
Google Pixel 3 is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A01, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.