Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is better than the Samsung Galaxy A01, having a general score of 80.7 against 71.6. Google Pixel 3 XL is an older and heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A01, but Google managed to build it a little thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a brighter screen than Galaxy A01, because it has a little larger display, a lot higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and way more pixels per inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A01 has just a bit more storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 3430mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Google Pixel 3 XL is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A01, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.