Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is much better than the Galaxy A01, with a global score of 81.9 against 71.6. Google Pixel 4's body is just a little heavier but a little thinner than the Galaxy A01, and both were only released with a couple months difference. The Google Pixel 4 has a brighter screen than Galaxy A01, and although they both have a same size display, the Google Pixel 4 also has a much better display pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px.
Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A01 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A01 has a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way larger aperture, a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality photos.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A01. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A01, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.