Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than Galaxy A01, getting a global score of 82.9 against 71.6. The Google Pixel 4 XL design is a lot heavier but just a little thinner than Galaxy A01, and they were only released with a few months difference. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a bit larger display, much more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
The Samsung Galaxy A01 counts with a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has just 16 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL shoots slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture, a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos and a much higher (4K) video definition. Google Pixel 4 XL features longer battery duration than Galaxy A01, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A01. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A01, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.