Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is much better than Galaxy A01's 71.6 overall score. Google Pixel 5 is a just a little bit thinner phone than the Galaxy A01, but both of them weight 5.33oz. Google Pixel 5 counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a better pixels density and a quite larger screen.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 5 features more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A01, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 36 percent more battery size. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A01, because although it has a worse resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a lot bigger aperture and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A01. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A01, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.