Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 295 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy A01's score of 71.6. The HTC One M9 body is extremely older, thicker and just a little bit heavier than Galaxy A01. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has the previous 5.0 version and Galaxy A01 has Android 11.
HTC One M9 has a better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also has a larger amount of RAM, a 64-bit processor and a GPU. The HTC One M9 has an incredibly better display than Galaxy A01, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px and more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A01 counts with just a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has just 16 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. HTC One M9 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a F2.2 aperture, the HTC One M9 also has a camera with much more MP, a way larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A01 has just a little bit longer battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although HTC One M9 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A01. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A01, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.