Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 295 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a global score of 77, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A01's overall score of 71.6. HTC U Ultra's construction is a little thinner than Galaxy A01, although it is somewhat heavier and was released many years before. Galaxy A01 counts with a little bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with 4 more processing cores (although slower).
The HTC U Ultra has a better display than Galaxy A01, and although they both have a same size display, the HTC U Ultra also has a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a much better display pixels density. The HTC U Ultra counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A01, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The HTC U Ultra features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture. The HTC U Ultra features a battery performance that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy A01's battery life.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A01. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy HTC U Ultra, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A01, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.